《语文报·初中版》第159、165期分别刊登了甘人的《小说中的人物、事件能作论据吗》以及王延学的《论据虚假》。两篇文章一致认为“小说中的人物、事件是不能用作论据的,因为它们是虚构的,而议论文的事实论据应该是真实的……”对此,本人不敢苟同。因为在论据的“真实性”问题上.他俩过分强调了“生活真实”,却排除了“艺术真实”。殊不知,从文学理论的角度看,“艺术真实……从更高的意义上说,它比生活真实是更 In the 159th and 165th editions of the “Chinese Journal of Junior High School Edition”, Gan Man’s “The Characters and Events in the Novel Can Be Used as Arguments” and Wang Yanxue’s “False Argument” were published. The two articles all agreed that “characters and events in the novel cannot be used as arguments because they are fictitious and argumentative factual arguments should be true...” I cannot agree with this. Because on the issue of the “authenticity” of the argument, they overemphasized “the truth of life” but ruled out “artistic truth.” As everyone knows, from the point of view of literary theory, "the truth of art... In a higher sense, it is more than real life.