论文部分内容阅读
按照中国邮政的解释,中国邮政的邮政资费定价低于成本,注定要亏损。那么出路只有一个:提高邮政资费。于是,从1995到1999年,中国邮政的邮政资费,一封平信从8分钱涨到了0.80元,上扬了10倍,可亏损却从每年47亿元上升到154亿元。到2000年底,中国人的人均邮政消费仅0.36元,尚不足一根冰棍钱,萎缩如此,邮政能不越亏越深吗?而且随着@时代的到来,通讯技术在发生革命性的巨变,传统的邮政业务急剧萎缩,许多服务项目甚至接近消亡,这就不能不让我们发出这样的疑问:
According to the explanation of China Post, the postal tariff of China Post is priced lower than the cost and is doomed to loss. Then there is only one way out: to increase postal rates. Thus, from 1995 to 1999, the postal tariff of China Post, a flat letter rose from 8 cents to 0.80 yuan, up 10 times, but the loss rose from 4.7 billion yuan per year to 15.4 billion yuan. By the end of 2000, the average per capita postal consumption of Chinese people was only 0.36 yuan, less than a piece of popsicle money, so that the postal government could not go further and deeper. And with the advent of revolution in technology, The sharp decline of the traditional postal service and the fact that many service projects are even nearing death can not but allow us to issue such a question: