泉州市中级人民法院对本案的二审判决是正确的。本案从侦查、起诉、一审判决到二审判决始终存在着争议,二审判决改变了一审判决的定性,也改变了一审判决的量刑,是一个非常好的判例。本案争议的焦点实际就在于,被告人林晓毅非法占有购房户钱款的行为是否利用了其担任厦门市立丹行置业有限公司营销中心置业顾问的职务便利。可以肯定地说,被告人林晓毅确实利用了职 Quanzhou Intermediate People’s Court on the second instance of the case verdict is correct. This case from the investigation, prosecution, first instance verdict to the second instance verdict there is always controversy, second instance verdict has changed the first instance verdict, but also changed the sentencing of first instance verdict is a very good precedent. The actual controversy in this case lies in whether Lin Xiaoyi, the defendant, illegally acquired the money of the purchasers’ households, took advantage of his position as a home consultant for the marketing center of Xiamen City Danhang Properties Limited. To be sure, defendant Lin Xiaoyi did indeed take advantage of his position