论文部分内容阅读
目的:对中文版《运动行为调节问卷》(BRSQ-6)在中国大学生运动员人群的应用进行信效度检验。方法:研究者采用翻译-回译的方法将BRSQ-6翻译成中文,并在334名中国大学生运动员人群中进行施测。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)及探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)对BRSQ六个测量模型进行了检验和比较,对BRSQ-6的结构效度进行检验。同时,对内部一致性信度及理论效度进行检验。结果:与已有研究相一致,BRSQ-6六因子模型(模型1)相对拟合更好。已有研究表明CFA在多因子模型估计中体现的不足,可以通过ESEM得以解决。研究发现,ESEM结果优于CFA结果,并且更加合理。另外,研究结果表明各分量表的内部一致性信度及问卷的理论效度均达到预期可接受水平。结论:整体而言,中文版BRSQ-6的信效度指标达到可接受水平,但个别条目的跨因子现象存在异常,仍需进一步修订及检验。
OBJECTIVE: To test the validity of the BRSQ-6 Chinese college student athlete population. METHODS: The researchers translated BRTQ-6 into Chinese using the translation-backtracking method and performed the test in 334 Chinese college student athletes. Six test models of BRSQ were tested and compared by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), and the structural validity of BRSQ-6 was tested. At the same time, the internal consistency reliability and the validity of the theory are tested. Results: Consistent with previous studies, the BRSQ-6 six-factor model (model 1) fits better. Studies have shown that CFA in the multi-factor model to estimate the shortcomings can be solved by ESEM. The study found that ESEM results outweigh the CFA results and are more reasonable. In addition, the research results show that the internal consistency reliability of each subscale and the theoretical validity of the questionnaire reach the expected acceptable level. Conclusion: Overall, the reliability of BRSQ-6 in Chinese version is at an acceptable level. However, the cross-factor phenomenon of individual items is abnormal and needs further revision and testing.