Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin in clinical practice-results of the PROVIL-study

来源 :World Journal of Diabetes | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:whqqqqqqq
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
AIM:To investigate efficacy and safety of vildagliptin compared to other oral antidiabetics in clinical practice in Germany.METHODS:In this prospective,open,observational study,patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) previously on oral monotherapy were selected by their treating physician to receive either vildagliptin addon to metformin(cohort 1),vildagliptin+metformin single-pill combination(SPC)(cohort 2)or another dual combination therapy with oral antidiabetic drugs(OADs)(cohort 3).According to routine clinical practice,interim examinations occurred every 3 mo:at baseline,after approximately 3 mo and after approximately 6 mo.Parameters documented in the study included demographic and diagnostic data,history of T2DM,data on diabetes control,vital signs,relevant prior and concomitant medication and disease history.Efficacy was assessed by changes in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose(FPG)3 mo and 6 mo after initiation of dual combination therapy.Safety was assessed by adverseevent reporting and measurement of specific laboratory values(serum creatinine,total bilirubin,alanine aminotransferase,aspartate aminotransferase,creatine kinase).RESULTS:Between October 2009 and January 2011,a total of 3881 patients were enrolled in this study.Since 47 patients were withdrawn due to protocol violations,3834 patients were included in the statistical analysis.There were no relevant differences between the three cohorts concerning age,body weight and body mass index.Average diabetes duration was approximately 6 years and mean HbA1c was between 7.6%and 7.9% at baseline.Antidiabetic treatment was recorded in 3648 patients.Patients were treated with vildagliptin add-on to metformin(n=603),vildagliptin+metformin(SPC)(n =2198),and other oral OADs including combinations of metformin with sulfonylurea(n=370),with glitazones(n =123),other dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors(n=99).After 6 mo of treatment,the absolute decrease in HbA1c(mean±SE)was significantly more pronounced in patients receiving vildagliptin add-on to metformin(-0.9% ±0.04%)and vildagliptin+metformin(SPC)(-0.9%± 0.03%)than in patients receiving other OADs(-0.6% ±0.04%;P<0.0001).In addition,significant cohort differences were observed for the improvement in FPG after 6 mo treatment(vildagliptin add-on to metformin:-291 mg/L±18.3 mg/L;vildagliptin+metformin(SPC):-305 mg/L±9.6 mg/L;other antidiabetic drugs:-209 mg/L±14.0 mg/L for(P<0.0001).Moderate decreases in body weight(absolute difference between last control and baseline:mean±SE)were observed for patients in all cohorts(vildagliptin add-on to metformin:-1.4 kg ±0.17 kg;vildagliptin+metformin(SPC):-1.7 kg± 0.09 kg;other OADs:?0.8 kg±0.13 kg).No significant differences in adverse events(AEs)and other safety measures were observed between the cohorts.When performing an additional analysis by age(patients<65 years vs patients≥65 years),there was no relevant difference in the most common AEs between the two age groups and the AE profile was similar to that of the overall patient population.CONCLUSION:Clinical practice confirms that vildagliptin is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in combination with metformin in T2DM patients. AIM: To investigate efficacy and safety of vildagliptin compared to other oral antidiabetics in clinical practice in Germany. METHODS: In this prospective, open, observational study, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) previously on oral monotherapy were selected by their treating physician to receive either vildagliptin addon to metformin (cohort 1), vildagliptin + metformin single-pill combination (SPC) (cohort 2) or another dual combination therapy with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) (cohort 3). According to routine clinical practice, interim examinations occurred every 3 mo: at baseline, after approximately 3 mo and after approximately 6 months. Parameters in the study included demographic and diagnostic data, history of T2DM, data on diabetes control, vital signs, relevant prior and concomitant medication and disease history . Efficacy was assessed by changes in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 3 mo and 6 mo after initiation of dual combination therapy. Safety was assessed by adverseeven t reporting and measurement of specific laboratory values ​​(serum creatinine, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatine kinase) .RESULTS: Between October 2009 and January 2011, a total of 3881 patients were enrolled in this study .ince 47 patients were withdrawn due to protocol violations, 3834 patients were included in the statistical analysis. There were no relevant differences between the three cohorts concerning age, body weight and body mass index. Average diabetes duration was approximately 6 years and mean HbA1c was between 7.6% and 7.9% at baseline. Antidiabetic treatment was recorded in 3648 patients. Patients were treated with vildagliptin add-on to metformin (n = 603), vildagliptin + metformin (SPC) (n = 2198), and other oral OADs including combinations of metformin with sulfonylurea n = 370), with glitazones (n = 123), other dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (n = 99). After 6 mo of treatment, the absolute decrease in HbA1c (mean ± SE) was significantly more pronounced in pati ents receiving vildagliptin add-on to metformin (-0.9% ± 0.04%) and vildagliptin + metformin (SPC) (-0.9% ± 0.03%) than in patients receiving other OADs (-0.6% ± 0.04%; P <0.0001). In addition, significant cohort differences were observed for the improvement in FPG after 6 mo treatment (vildagliptin add-on to metformin: -291 mg / L ± 18.3 mg / L; vildagliptin + metformin (SPC): - 305 mg / L ± 9.6 Other antidiabetic drugs: -209 mg / L ± 14.0 mg / L for (P <0.0001). Moderate decreases in body weight (absolute difference between last control and baseline: mean ± SE) were observed for patients in all cohorts (vildagliptin add-on to metformin: -1.4 kg ± 0.17 kg; vildagliptin + metformin (SPC): -1.7 kg ± 0.09 kg; other OADs: -0.8 kg ± 0.13 kg) .No significant differences in adverse events other safety measures were observed between the cohorts.When performing an additional analysis by age (patients <65 years vs patients ≥65 years), there was no relevant difference in the most common AEs between the two age groups and the AE profile was similar to that of the overall patient population. CONCLUSION: Clinical practice confirms that vildagliptin is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in combination with metformin in T2DM patients.
其他文献
为促进和加强海峡两岸四地图书馆学信息科学期刊编辑出版的业务与学术交流,更好地总结和分享办刊经验和重要的学术研究成果,共同商讨数字化网络化环境下如何推动两岸四地图书
本文针对如何提高振动磨机破碎效率问题从优化设计磨介的几何参数方面进行了理论分析和实验研究,给出了其设计程序QZMOPT。并通过实例证明了该程序的有效性及实用性。 In this pape
经久不息的掌声,依依不散的观众,一出现代京剧如此感人至深,令人欣喜不已。作者在改革的大背景下,以某厂评定高级职称为线索,描写了一群知识分子的喜怒哀乐,剧作充溢着对知
摘 要 在教育多样化的现代教学中,不断地采用方法各异的教学模式逐渐适应了教育事业的发展。目前,针对体育教学的发展,出现了分层教学方法,这种体育教学方法的使用,从很大程度上提高了体育教学的质量,同时,也大力地提升了学生的学习积极性。因此,就分层教学法在体育教学中的作用及意义来分析和探讨一下。  【关键词】分层教学法;农村体育;体育课  体育教育越来越多地受到了社会和教育家的重视,只有拥有了强健的体魄
介绍了近年来出现的一种度量信号复杂程度的统计量——估计熵(Approximateentropy),并将其用于信号的模糊滤波。这种滤波器具有能随信号的特征自动调节滤波器结构的优点,特别是当信号为非平稳时有较
历代在杭州当官的刺史(太守)中,名气最盛又最为后人称道的自然是白居易和苏东坡两位。这是人所共知的。为官一任,留下的不只是政绩,还有名声和百姓的口碑。“杭州太守例能诗
《庄子音义》是研究中国古代思想史的重要参考书之一,原属唐陆德明所撰《经典释文》第二十六,二十七,二十八卷。由于年代久远,存世至今的早期刻本已不多见。现分别藏存于我
抗癌树种琐谈白兆文,梁卓癌症是当今世界对人类威胁最大的死神之一,它每年要夺走数以万计人的生命。为了预防和制服癌症,各国医学家都致力于癌症防治的研究,并取得令人鼓舞的成果
本红外测量装置有一个用于聚集来自人体的红外光束的聚光装置。一引导装置将被监视的空间划分成若干个水平和垂直区域,并将红外光束引导到红外传感器中与光束方向相对应的部
运用全电磁的相对论的2.5维粒子模拟程序MAGIC模拟分析了3cm相对论返波管中注-波互作用的非线性过程,得到了器件微波输出功率,效率,工作频率等参量,模拟结果与实验数据较好地一致。对电子注特