在司法实践中 ,言词证据因其可变更性 ,易成为控辩双方在法庭上争论的焦点 ,检法两家在认定上也容易产生较大的分歧。为了缩小认识上的差异 ,保证公正执法 ,笔者就言词证据的审查判断阐释一家之言。一、庭前供证一致 ,但在庭审阶段翻供、翻证的审查判断言词证据包括犯罪嫌疑人 In judicial practice, because of its variable nature, evidential evidence tends to become the focus of argument between the prosecution and the defense in court. It is also easy for the two parties to make big differences in the determination. In order to narrow the difference in cognition and ensure just law enforcement, the author expounds the explanation of one of the verbal evidences. First, the evidence before the court is consistent, but in the trial stage turn over, reversal of evidence to determine verbal evidence, including suspects