论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨心理干预对A国和B国维和官兵适应障碍的影响并分析其相关因素。方法:采用军人适应不良量表和社会支持量表,对A国和B国维和官兵心理适应不良水平进行测评,比较心理干预前、后适应不良各因子分值并分析其相关因素。结果:心理干预前,A国和B国维和官兵适应不良总分值及各因子分值间差异不显著(P>0.05);经3个月心理干预后,除B国维和官兵环境适应因子分值差异不显著外(P>0.05),A国和B国维和官兵适应不良总分值及各因子分值均显著低于干预前(P<0.05),且A国维和官兵适应不良总分值及各因子分值较B国降低更为显著。两国维和官兵干预前适应不良总分值及各因子分值均显著高于中国陆军常模(P<0.05)。单因素直线相关分析显示A国人际关系因子分值与受教育年限呈显著负相关(P<0.05);多元逐步回归分析显示影响适应不良各因素均不能进入适应不良各因子的回归方程(P>0.05)。结论:良好的社会支持和有效的心理干预可显著降低维和官兵适应障碍的发生率。
Objective: To investigate the psychological intervention on A and B countries peacekeeping officers and men to adapt to the impact of obstacles and analyze its related factors. Methods: The servicemen’s adaptability scale and social support scale were used to evaluate the psychological adaptation level of A and B officers and soldiers. The scores of various maladjusted factors before and after psychological intervention were compared and their related factors were analyzed. Results: Before the psychological intervention, the total score of adverse maladjusted and peacekeeping officers and soldiers in A and B countries were not significantly different (P> 0.05). After 3 months of psychological intervention, except for the environmental adaptation factor (P> 0.05). The total score of adverse maladjustment and the score of each factor in A and B countries were significantly lower than those before intervention (P <0.05) And the score of each factor is more significant than that of country B. The scores of maladjusted males and soldiers before intervention in both countries were significantly higher than those of Chinese army norm (P <0.05). One-way linear correlation analysis showed that the scores of interpersonal relationship in A were significantly negatively correlated with the years of education (P <0.05). Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that all the factors affecting maladaptation did not enter the regression equation of various factors (P> 0.05). Conclusion: Good social support and effective psychological intervention can significantly reduce the incidence of ADHD.