论文部分内容阅读
目的:对食管癌治疗方法及疗效进行详细探究。方法:选取2015年5月至2016年5月贵阳中医学院第二附属医院收治的116例食管癌患者作为研究对象,根据治疗方法不同,将116例食管癌患者分为对照组54例和观察组62例。观察组患者行胸腔镜腹腔镜联合食管癌手术治疗,对照组患者行开放手术治疗。比较两组患者手术效果及术后并发症发生情况。结果:观察组患者术后拔出胸管时间短于对照组,术后胸腹液引流量低于对照组患者,同时术中出血量也明显低于对照组患者,对照组患者并发症发生率为16.67%,观察组患者并发症发生率为1.6%,组间比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在对食管癌实施治疗时,采用胸腔镜腹腔镜联合手术进行治疗,与传统的开放手术治疗方法相比,不仅疗效显著,而且术后并发症发生几率比较低,有利于改善患者预后。
Objective: To investigate esophageal cancer treatment and efficacy in detail. Methods: A total of 116 esophageal cancer patients admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guiyang Medical College from May 2015 to May 2016 were selected as study subjects. According to the different treatment methods, 116 patients with esophageal cancer were divided into control group (54 cases) and observation group 62 cases. Patients in the observation group underwent thoracoscopic laparoscopic surgery combined with esophageal cancer surgery and patients in the control group underwent open surgery. The operative effect and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared. Results: The time of pulling out the chest tube in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group. The drainage volume of the chest and abdomen fluid in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, meanwhile, the bleeding volume in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group. The complication rate in the control group Was 16.67%. The complication rate in the observation group was 1.6%. There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of esophageal cancer, the use of laparoscopic laparoscopic surgery, compared with the traditional open surgery treatment, not only significant effect, but the incidence of postoperative complications is relatively low, is conducive to improving the prognosis of patients.