论文部分内容阅读
随着竞技体育商业性、娱乐性的增强,竞技体育中的伤害行为屡见不鲜,多由竞技体育领域通过行业规范自行调整与治理,而各国很少将其入罪。现有正当业务说、被害人承诺说、社会正当性说等主流学说支持竞技体育中伤害行为的正当性。而随着社会发展,部分行为失去其社会正当性,那么就有入罪可能性与必要性,对运动员主观目的不同进行区别对待处理,以期端正赛风,保护运动员人身健康,促进竞技体育事业有序发展。
With the commercial and entertainment enhancement of competitive sports, the harmful behaviors in competitive sports are not uncommon. They are mostly regulated and controlled by the sports industry through the industry norms, while the countries seldom do so. The existing legitimate business says that the victim promises that the mainstream doctrine of social justification supports the justification of injury in competitive sports. And with the social development, some of the acts lose their social legitimacy, then there is the possibility and necessity of incriminating the athletes to distinguish between the subjective purpose of different treatment, in order to correct the race to protect the physical health of athletes and promote competitive sports Order development.