论文部分内容阅读
1985年,“二十世纪中国文学”由钱理群、陈平原、黄子平三人提出后,在学界引起了很大反响,正面的激赏和反对的批评质疑与之俱来,但这些仍然囿于就80年代的文化逻辑谈80年代的文学史观念。在西方“后学”的影响下,90年代的研究者逐渐对知识的话语生产过程,及相关知识谱系的研究产生了兴趣。一些研究者以搁置价值判断的“再解读”为研究范式,重返80年代话语生产场域,试图发掘知识话语背后的“无意识”。批评者如何对“二十世纪中国文学”进行再解读,以及再解读的背后的策略正是我们所关注的。
In 1985, when “Twentieth Century Chinese Literature” was put forward by Qian Liqun, Chen Pingyuan and Huang Zhiping, it caused great repercussions in the academic world. Positive criticisms of appreciation and objection queried either, but these He still talked about the concept of literary history in the 1980s on the cultural logic of the 1980s. Under the influence of Western “after school”, researchers in 1990s gradually became interested in the study of knowledge discourse production process and related knowledge pedigree. Some researchers put aside the “re-interpretation ” of value judgments as a paradigm to return to the field of discourse production in the 1980s, trying to explore “unconscious ” behind the discourse of knowledge. How the critics re-interpret “Chinese Literature in the Twentieth Century” and the tactics behind the re-interpretation are exactly what we are concerned about.