论文部分内容阅读
本文认为:折中是一种承认事物的共性,顾及矛盾的对立面,用和而不同的方法解决问题,以达到不偏不倚、无过不及的“中”,即趋于恰到好处的最佳点的科学研究方法。它不同于折衷主义那种没有自己的立场,只把各种不同的思潮无原则地机械地拼凑在一起的哲学观点。马克思主义哲学的对立统一规律,就是折中方法的哲学根据。我国社科研究的现实需要折中。因此,必须消除对折中的偏见,只有这样才能处理好古今关系、中外关系,推进哲学社会科学的发展。
This paper argues that the compromise is a kind of recognition of things in common, take into account the contradictions of opposites, with different methods to solve the problem, in order to achieve impartiality, the “no”, that is, the best point tends to be just right Scientific research methods. It is different from the philosophical viewpoint of eclecticism that it does not have its own position and mechanically combines all kinds of ideological trends without principle. The law of unity and opposition of Marxist philosophy is the philosophical basis for the compromise method. The reality of social science research in our country needs a compromise. Therefore, the prejudice against bias must be eliminated. Only in this way can we handle the relations between ancient and modern China and foreign countries and promote the development of philosophy and social science.