论文部分内容阅读
我国的学者认为:“法律是价值判断,法学是事实判断。”本文从法律和价值两个方面来对上述观点的命题进行推翻。从法律的角度上看,法律方法属于法律,一些法律方法是完全从价值的评判来进行裁断的,具有主观性,因此可以说法学的法律方法具有很浓重的价值判断的色彩,从价值的角度上看,并不是将价值判断放入其中,而是从中剔除了一些,因此具有更深层次的价值,所以说,“法律是价值判断,法学是事实判断。”是没有依据的,也就是说,法学不是事实判断,而是价值判断。
Our scholars think: “Law is value judgments, law is fact judgments.” This article from the law and value of two aspects of the proposition to overthrow the view. From a legal point of view, the legal method belongs to the law, and some legal methods are entirely judged by the value judgment. Therefore, it can be said that the legal method of jurisprudence has a very strong color of value judgment. From a value point of view From the point of view, it is not the value judgments into it, but removed from some, so have a deeper level of value, so that “law is the value of judgments, law is factual judgments.” There is no basis, that is That law is not factual judgment, but value judgments.