《四川文物》2014年第2期发表了北京大学考古文博学院倪润安先生的论文《从叱罗招男墓志看北魏道武帝早年入蜀事迹》,该文围绕墓志“其先氏胄,出自成都”一句,猜测墓主叱罗招男的从祖叱罗结为蜀地賨人,又因其有“元从”之勋,推断他与拓跋珪于蜀地结交,从而证明拓跋珪在代国灭亡后被前秦俘虏,并罪徙蜀地的传说。倪文通过逻辑搭桥的办法间接论证拓跋珪早年经历,中间缺少必要的证据环节,因此实难成立。通过对“成都”语词,代人军政集团的构造与价值取向及拓跋珪的文化素养的辨析,可以断定拓跋珪亡国后并未离开代北草原。《晋书》及南朝正史对拓跋早期史事的记载多属道听途说,不足凭信。 “Sichuan Cultural Relics” 2014 the second issue of the Peking University Institute of Archeology and Museology, Mr. Ni Runan’s article “from the Miluo Luo Men’s epitaph to see the Northern Wei Dynasty Emperor Wu Di into the early years of deeds,” the article around the Epitaph One, guessing the gravestone Luo Luo strokes men from the ancestral Luo knot to Shu people, because of their “Yuan from ” of the Xun, concluded that he and Tuoba 珪 Yu Shu made to prove that Tuoba 珪 in the generation After the country was exterminated by the former Qin prisoners, and the crime of relocation of Shu legend. Ni Wen indirectly through logical bridging proof of early experience of Tuba, the middle of the lack of necessary evidence links, it is difficult to set up. Through the analysis of the terms of “Chengdu” and the construction and value orientation of the generation of military and political groups and the cultural attainment of Tuoba, we can conclude that Tuoba Kui did not leave the northern grassland after its death. “Book of Jin” and the history of the Southern Dynasties records of early Tuoba episode mostly hearsay, lack of trust.