论文部分内容阅读
目的比较两种常用蟑螂监测方法在动车组列车上的实际监测效果,为动车组列车的蟑螂监测提供科学依据。方法随机抽取某铁路局34组动车组列车并随机均分为两组,分别使用药激法和粘捕法进行监测结果的对比观察。结果药激法和粘捕法监测所得的蟑螂密度分别为0.43、5.92只/厢,侵害率分别为11.76%、38.24%。结论动车组列车蟑螂监测使用粘捕法更能体现真实的蟑螂侵害情况。
Objective To compare the actual monitoring results of two common cockroach monitoring methods on EMU trains and provide a scientific basis for the monitoring of cockroaches in EMU trains. Methods A total of 34 EMU train trains from a railway bureau were randomly selected and divided into two groups at random. The results of monitoring were compared using drug-induced and stick-catching methods respectively. Results The density of cockroaches obtained by the method of drug shock and sticky catching were 0.43 and 5.92, respectively. The infestation rates were 11.76% and 38.24% respectively. Conclusion EMU train cockroach monitoring using sticky catching method can better reflect the real cockroach infringement.