论文部分内容阅读
本文通过白水社区发展基金的个案研究,对马克思1867年提出的“共同占有之下的个人所有制”进行探讨,指出马克思所期望的“个人所有制”是基于“共生性个人主义”之下的个人所有制,不同于“占有性个人主义”和“自由个人主义”。共有(而非公有)与个人所有(而非私有)作为产权的两端,具有深层逻辑上的共通。在“人是社会之人,社会是人之社会”的伦理之下,共有与个人所有两者方能达到真正的融合。白水社区发展基金以其本土传统文化逻辑接纳了外来文化,并让其中最优秀的文化落地,剔除了其中商业化和资本剥削的部分,圆满地完成了一种“文化并接”。
Based on a case study of the White Water Community Development Fund, this paper probes into Marx’s personal ownership under common ownership as proposed by Marx in 1867, pointing out that Marx’s “personal ownership” is based on “symbiotic individualism” “Under the personal ownership, different from ” individualistic “and ” free individualism “. There is a deep logical co-existence between public ownership (not public ownership) and individual ownership (as opposed to private ownership) as the ends of property rights. Under the ethics of ”people are social people and society social people’s life“, the true integration can be achieved between the two. Baishui Community Development Fund accepted the foreign culture with its native traditional culture logic and allowed the best of the cultures to come to an end, excluding the commercialization and capital exploitation, and successfully completed a ”culture connection".