反话的意思是一种“言外之意”,如何解释,这对迄今为止的语义理论提出了挑战。格赖斯从语用学角度研究反话,根据自己所提出的会话合作原则,提出判断反话的标准。但这一研究方法仍有不足。斯珀伯和威尔逊在指出格赖斯研究路子的重要缺陷后,认为反话是回声提述。本文作者在他们理论的基础上,从语义场理论的角度,对反话这一表达方式的本质作了解释。 The meaning of anti-talk is a kind of “implication” and how to explain it, which poses a challenge to the semantic theory so far. Grice from the perspective of pragmatics study anti-talk, according to his proposed principle of dialogue cooperation, put forward to judge the standard of anti-talk. However, this research method is still inadequate. Speaking of the important flaws in Grice’s path of study, Spencer and Wilson saw the opposite as an echo. On the basis of their theories, the author of this article explains the essence of the anti-talk expression from the perspective of semantic field theory.