论文部分内容阅读
仲裁机构在整个仲裁过程中承担的是管理和服务职能,其是否应当对仲裁活动承担民事责任,主要看仲裁机构与当事人、仲裁员之间法律关系的性质。美、英、法三国立法代表着三种不同的仲裁机构责任豁免立场。目前有些仲裁机构则通过仲裁规则免除自己的民事责任,但是否有效值得商榷。我国立法关于仲裁机构民事责任的规定缺失,应当在认清我国仲裁发展现状的基础上,以当事人与仲裁机构间的合同关系为基础,从仲裁机构应当更好地为当事人服务的仲裁政策出发,同时保证仲裁的独立性和权威性,构建我国仲裁机构民事责任制度。
Arbitration agencies throughout the arbitration process is assumed by the management and service functions, whether it should bear civil liability for arbitration activities, mainly to see arbitration institutions and parties, the nature of the legal relationship between arbitrators. The legislation of the United States, Britain and France represents the position of immunity of three different arbitration institutions. At present, some arbitration institutions exempt their own civil liability through arbitration rules, but whether it is valid or not is debatable. On the basis of recognizing the status quo of arbitration in our country and based on the contractual relationship between the parties and the arbitration institutions, the legislation of our country should be based on the arbitration policy that arbitration institutions should serve the clients better, At the same time, it will guarantee the independence and authority of arbitration and construct the civil liability system of arbitration institutions in our country.