论文部分内容阅读
按人类实践的逻辑,所有人类问题都可归于四个基本提问:对象为何物?对象谓何义?对象能何改?对象当何改?其中1、3属于真值问题,2、4属于价值问题。对问题的答案可谓知识,所以知识亦有真值知识与价值知识之分。不论哪种知识都存在对错之辨,真值知识的对错体现为真假,价值知识的对错体现为良劣。分辨对错要有标准,分辨真值知识之真假的真值标准就是真值知识所描述的客观对象本身,分辨价值知识之良劣的价值标准则只能由人设定。在分辨知识对错的过程中,实践是证明知识是否正确的方法,而不是检验知识是否正确的标准。实践本身也可以是人的对象,实践同样存在正确与否的问题。判断实践的成功与否和判断实践的正确与否不是一回事,前者需以实践目的为标准,后者需以价值目标为标准。
According to the logic of human practice, all human problems can be attributed to four basic questions: What is the object? What is the object? What can be changed? What is the object? Where1, 3 belong to the question of the true value, 2,4 belong to the value problem. The answers to the questions can be described as knowledge, so knowledge also has the distinction between truth value and value knowledge. No matter what kind of knowledge there is the right and wrong, the true value of the right and wrong reflected as true and false, the wrong value of the value of the good and bad. The standard of truth and falsity that distinguishes between right and wrong is the objective object described by true knowledge, and the value criterion of distinguishing good knowledge of value can only be set by man. In the process of distinguishing between right and wrong, practice is a way to prove whether the knowledge is correct or not, instead of testing the correctness of knowledge. Practice itself can also be the object of human beings, the practice of the same problem exists or not. To judge whether the practice is successful or not is not the same as judging whether the practice is correct or not, the former should be based on the practical purpose and the latter on the basis of the value goal.