论文部分内容阅读
不正当竞争行为严重侵蚀着市场经济的肌体,因此,世界各国均采取严格的措施调控不正当竞争行为。西方各国一般采取司法控制模式,我国则采取了以行政控制为主、司法控制为辅的模式,两种模式各有其特征和利弊。除了这两种模式外,在当今“小政府、大社会”的氛围中,另辟蹊径社会中介组织控制模式亦是完善竞争控制模式的良策。因而我国不妨采取以司法控制为主、行政控制和社会中介组织控制为辅的综合控制模式。
Unfair competition seriously erodes the body of a market economy. Therefore, all countries in the world adopt strict measures to control unfair competition. The western countries generally adopt the mode of judicial control, while our country adopts the mode that mainly consists of administrative control and supplemented by judicial control. Each of the two modes has its own characteristics and advantages and disadvantages. In addition to these two models, in today’s climate of “small government and big society,” another way of controlling social intermediary organizations is also a good way to perfect the competitive control mode. Therefore, our country may wish to adopt a comprehensive control mode that is mainly controlled by the judiciary, supplemented by administrative control and social intermediary organizations.