论文部分内容阅读
文章对徐烈烔、刘丹青提出的“话题焦点”进行了重新定性,认为“话题焦点”不是焦点,而是对比话题。首先,“话题焦点”界定标准存在问题,[±突出]与[±对比]是不可分离的;其次,“话题焦点”不具有焦点[+突出]的共性特征,也不符合焦点一个句子只有一个焦点的焦点定义。文章还对“连”字句的信息结构进行了讨论,认为“连”字句后的成分是对比话题,并从省略和否定两个角度证明了“连”字后的成分不是对比焦点。
The article re-characterizes the “topic focus” raised by Xu Lieji and Liu Danqing and holds that “topic focus” is not the focus, but rather the topic of comparison. First of all, there is a problem with the definition of “topic focus ”. [± prominent] is inseparable from [± contrast]; secondly, “topic focus” does not have the common features of focus [+ highlighting] A sentence has only one focus definition. The article also discusses the information structure of the sentence “Lianlian” and holds that the composition after the sentence “Lianlian” is a contrastive topic and it is proved from the angles of omission and negation that the composition after the “Lianlian” is not Contrast focus.