论文部分内容阅读
股东对公司的出资关系着公司的运营、资本的充足、乃至公司的灵魂。如今很多涉及公司方面的案件中,股东的出资纠纷越来越成为此类案件的重头之重。而我国在股东虚假出资方面的立法还有很多不足之处,这就对于股东的虚假出资方面的认定呈现出不同的疑问和争议。根据股东出资方式的不同,认定虚假出资的方式也有很多不同之处。对于虚假出资的认定的不同,更加影响到对于股东虚假出资所应该承担的责任的确立。
Shareholders’ contribution to the company is related to the operation of the company, the adequacy of capital, and the soul of the company. Today, many cases involving the company, the shareholders of the funding dispute has increasingly become the top priority of such cases. However, there are still many shortcomings in the legislation on the false contribution of the shareholders in our country, which presents different questions and controversies about the affirmation of the shareholder’s false contribution. According to the different ways of shareholders’ capital contribution, there are also many differences in the way of affirming false capital contribution. The different affirmation of the fictitious contribution further affects the establishment of the responsibility that should be assumed by the fake shareholder.