论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨“高住低练”(运动员睡在相当于2500m的高度,训练则在平原)与“低住低练”对划船运动员运动能力影响的差别。通过对20名划船运动员的对比研究,发现运动员在进行为期4周的高住低练过程中,实验组在实验第15天、第30天,红细胞数、红细胞压积及血红蛋白水平均明显高于实验前水平,对照组则在上述时间段无明显变化。HiLo组运动员4mmol/L乳酸无氧阈功率明显高于实验前,比实验前平均增长了31W,对照组仅增长了105W,与实验前相比无明显差异,实验组的增长值明显高于对照组。两组运动员的无氧作功能力无明显差异。实验组和对照组2000m成绩与实验前比较,均无显著性差异,但实验组的平均成绩提高幅度要大于对照组;5000m成绩两组与实验前比较都有明显提高,但是实验组出现十分显著的提高,提高值显著高于对照组。以上结果表明,高住低练能明显提高运动员的有氧耐力和专项耐力成绩
Objective: To explore the difference between “live in low training” (athletes sleep at the equivalent of 2500m, training in the plain) and “low living low training” on the athletic ability of rowers. Through the comparative study of 20 rowers, it was found that the athletes in the 4-week high-living low-training process, the experimental group in the experiment 15 days, 30 days, the number of red blood cells, hematocrit and hemoglobin levels were significantly higher Before the experiment, the control group had no significant change in the above period. The power of 4 mmol / L lactic acid anaerobic threshold of HiLo athletes was significantly higher than that before experiment, an average increase of 31W compared with that before experiment, but only 105W increase in control group, which showed no significant difference compared with that before experiment, and the growth value of experimental group was obviously higher than that of control group. There was no significant difference in the anaerobic work ability between the two groups of athletes. There was no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group at 2000m and before the experiment, but the improvement of the average score of the experimental group was greater than that of the control group. The 5000m group had a significant improvement compared with that before the experiment, but the experimental group appeared very significant The increase was significantly higher than the control group. The above results show that high and low training can significantly improve the athletes aerobic endurance and endurance results