对文学作品的阅读,其目的当然是要导致对于作品的理解。理解的标志是理解与理解对象的一致,即读者的阅读视野在某种程度上与作品的视野发生重合。所以通常理论在这方面关注的是二者相一致的方面,而相反的另一面却被忽略了。从逻辑上讲,这是显而易见的:既然文学理解的标志,是理解与理解对象的一致性,那也就意味着,只有在理解与理解对象不一致的情况下,才会发生解读行为。因此,这种不一致是文学解读的前提条件,它与解读的目标(理解与理解对象的一致)之间,存在辩证的关系。可惜的是,这另一方面在我们文学理论研究中通常是不被提到的,更难以说得到关注和研究了。事实上,从发生论的意义上观察文学理解与理解对 The purpose of reading a literary work is, of course, to lead to an understanding of the work. The hallmark of understanding is the understanding and understanding of objects that readers’ reading horizons overlap to some extent with the horizons of the work. So usually the theory in this area is concerned with the two aspects of the same, but the opposite is ignored. Logically, this is obvious: since the hallmark of literary understanding is the comprehension and comprehension of objects, it means that interpretations take place only when the objects of understanding and understanding are inconsistent. Therefore, this inconsistency is a prerequisite for literary interpretation, which exists in a dialectical relationship with the objective of interpretation (understanding and understanding of objects). Unfortunately, on the other hand, it is usually not mentioned in our literary theory research, and it is even more difficult to say that it has attracted much attention and research. In fact, we can observe literary understanding and understanding from the perspective of genesis