AMD把“忘记”锁频的产品当成一种卖点推向市场, 当雷管驱动里开始加入超频选项,当各大主板厂商半遮半掩地在产品里施以超频技术……超频,这个一度只是闪耀在个别厂商和电脑高手头上的光环,如今已成为广大DIYer日常讨论话题中最普遍不过的一件事情——就连包括菜鸟在内的任何玩家都可以对超频问题指手划脚,而厂商们也会莫衷一是地对超频问题各说褒贬。 超频的做法由来已久,有关超频是否必要的争论也一直在延续着。就在催化剂驱动3.8正式版内加入了“OverDrive”之后,有关超频的朝天热火再次被ATI点燃。是否每个用户都需要超频呢?在一片“超”声中,我们不得不坐下来思考这个问题,从过去的一年左右时间内发掘那些“超频极品”,并从用户和厂商两方面综合考虑,希望能给读者,也给我们自己些许启示。(本文中所提及的“超频”概念,不仅是指频率方面的提升,而是通过某种手段,使得该产品(或其相关产品)在性能(或功能)方面超出最初的设计,在这范围之内的行为都称为“超频”。) AMD to “forget” lock frequency products as a selling point to the market, when the detonator driver began to add overclocking options, when the major motherboard manufacturers half-covered in the product overclocking technology ... overclocking, this was only The aura that shines on the heads of individual vendors and computer gurus has become one of the most common occurrences of everyday DIYer discussions - even any player, including rookies, can point their finger at the overclocking issue, Manufacturers will not agree on the overclocking issue each praise and criticism. Overclocking has a long history of debate over whether overclocking is necessary. Catalyst Catalyst 3.8 official version joined the “OverDrive”, overturned overturned heat was ATI lit again. Does every user need to overclock? In a “super” sound, we have to sit down and think about this issue, from the past year or so to explore those “overclocking Need”, and from the user and manufacturers both considered , I hope to give readers, but also give us some inspiration. (The term “overclocking,” as used in this article, refers not only to the increase in frequency, but rather to some means by which the product (or its related product) goes beyond the original design in terms of performance (or function) The behavior within the range is called “overclocking.”)