密尔在《功利主义》中根据“质”的不同,将快乐分为高等快乐和低等快乐,然从密尔的区分方法、区分标准、区分结果分析仍有不足。本文试以密尔的论证过程(其快乐观的提出,论证以及辩护)为线索对密尔快乐观进行分析,并对其不足予以初论。 In the “utilitarianism”, Mill separates happiness into higher happiness and lower happiness according to the difference of “quality”. However, there are still some shortcomings in distinguishing the results from the method of distinguishing the criteria from the Mill. This article attempts to analyze the Pleasure Mill’s perspective with clues to Mill’s argument process (the proposition, demonstration and defense of his pleasure), and makes a preliminary study of the problems.