论文部分内容阅读
依据文献计量学方法研制的各种核心期刊、引文库和数据源期刊的排名,其评价功能的影响越来越大。由于期刊数量大、内容杂,学科分类不易且为期刊排名的主办机构评价目的不明确,导致现状问题不少:入选的核心期刊并非都是指标在其学科排名前20%的期刊,偏离了布氏和加氏理论。期刊评价的主要目的是为了更有效地服务于科研管理和人才培养过程中的学术研究,文章建议依据国务院学位委员会办公室和教育部颁发的学科目录进行期刊学科分类,并借助互引链接图和聚类分析验证其分类的合理性并及时纠偏,调整期刊学科划分;合理正确的期刊分类、划分学科的方法是用文献相对集中理论遴选每一学科核心期刊的前提。
The evaluation of various journals, citation databases and data source journals based on bibliometrics has been increasingly influential. Due to the large number of journals, miscellaneous content, subject classification is not easy and rankings of the organizers of the evaluation of the purpose is not clear, leading to a number of status quo: selected core journals are not all indexes in the top 20% of its subjects periodicals, deviate from the cloth ’S and Gatches theory. The main purpose of periodical evaluation is to serve the academic research in the process of scientific research management and personnel training more effectively. According to the discipline catalogs issued by the Academic Degrees Committee of the State Council and the Ministry of Education, the article proposes that the periodicals should be classified according to the discipline, Class analysis to verify the rationality of its classification and timely rectification, adjust the periodical subject division; reasonable and correct classification of periodicals, the method of dividing subjects is to use the relative concentration of literature to select the core journals for each subject.