引子案例研究作为建筑学习的首要途径,大多围绕已经定型的设计成果倒推设计者的想法。然而这一“倒推”能在多大程度上还原出建筑设计的真实过程是值得怀疑的,因为设计思路向来不是单线递进的过程,而是枝蔓交错的网状路径。面对不断涌现的具体问题和潜在可能,设计思维一般徘徊于各种选项之间的权衡取舍,其间存在大量的陷阱和歧路,某些选项曾经出现并作用于过程,但并未呈现于结果。仅就最终结果所做的分析因原始信息的大量缺失而无法回溯设计行为的全部 As the primary approach to architectural learning, introductory case studies mostly push designers’ ideas around the stereotyped design results. However, it is doubtful how far this “pushback” can restore the true process of architectural design, since design ideas have never been a one-way process, but a staggered mesh path. In the face of emerging specific problems and their potential, design thinking is generally hovering over the trade-offs between various options. There are numerous pitfalls and gaps in the design thinking. Some of the options have appeared and have been applied to the process, but not presented in the results. Analyzes made solely for the final result can not be traced back to full design behavior due to extensive lack of original information