论文部分内容阅读
俄罗斯科学院院士德·谢·利哈乔夫基于对俄罗斯文学与文化的长期研究,对通行已久的有关古罗斯愚昧落后、停滞守旧、彼得大帝改革是俄罗斯历史转折点的观点提出了大胆挑战,并在此基础上就俄罗斯民族文化身份认同及国家发展道路问题与欧亚主义展开了论辩。利哈乔夫与欧亚主义最大的分歧就在于他坚信俄罗斯在宗教与文化上从来都是一个欧洲国家,在俄罗斯文化的形成发展过程中起决定性作用的是拜占庭和斯堪的纳维亚,而不是东方游牧民族的影响。他强调俄罗斯文化自古以来就生长于多元文化的沃土之中,今后仍将在在珍视民族传统、保持民族特色的基础上,与其他国家、民族的文化展开积极平等的交流和对话,从而源源不断地为俄罗斯文化的繁荣与发展注入新动力。
Based on a long-term study of Russian literature and culture, the Russian Academy of Sciences, based on long-term studies of Russian literature and culture, raised the daring challenge of the long-standing view that ancient Russ was ignorant, stranded, Peter the Great was a turning point in Russia’s history and On the basis of this, the author argues with Eurasianism about the identity of Russian national culture and the road to national development. The biggest difference between Lihachov and Eurasianism lies in his conviction that Russia has always been a European country in religion and culture. Byzantine and Scandinavian nations play a decisive role in the formation and development of Russian culture, Not the influence of the eastern nomads. He emphasized that Russian culture has been growing in the fertile soil of multiculturalism since ancient times and will continue to exchange and dialogue with other countries and ethnic groups on an equal footing with other countries and ethnic groups on the basis of cherishing national traditions and preserving national characteristics. The new impetus for the prosperity and development of Russian culture.