论文部分内容阅读
本文认为,在中国目前的制度架构下,采取法律共同体内部的推理、解释、论证等技术手段来限制审判裁量权的通路基本上被截断了。其结果,一方面很难在制度上有效地遏制司法腐败,另一方面又不得不通过外部的、极端的方式寻求司法公正。另外,中国司法改革正面临不同历史阶段犬牙交错的复杂状况,需要采取程序、议论、合意“函三为一”的复眼式观点。鉴于上述判断,作者主张怎样在精密司法与参与司法之间寻找一个适当的结合方式,是目前特别应该探讨的课题。
This paper argues that under the current institutional framework of China, the path of restricting the discretion of adjudication through the use of technical means such as reasoning, explanation and argumentation within the legal community is basically truncated. As a result, on the one hand, it is very difficult to effectively curb judicial corruption on the one hand, and on the other hand, it is imperative to seek judicial impartiality through external and extremist means. In addition, the judicial reform in China is facing the complicated situation of intertwining at different historical stages and requires a compound-type view of procedure, discussion and agreement. In view of the above judgment, the author advocates how to find an appropriate combination between fine justice and participation in justice, which is a topic that should be discussed at present.