论文部分内容阅读
地方志在史学研究中的价值已为人熟知,本文重点探讨史学研究中利用方志资料的几种不同取向,即作为资料直接引用、作制度分析后引用、透过背后社会权力话语后引用和透过文化规范后引用等4种利用方志的不同方式,并试图发现它与近年来学术思潮和史学研究的转向可能存在的关系,以及我们究竟能在多大程度上利用地方志资料。在此基础上,作者认为方志是一种资料性著述,并且建议第二轮新修方志应加强对首轮修志情况的记述。
The value of local chronicles in the study of history is well known. This article focuses on several different orientations of the use of local records in historiography, namely as a direct reference to the data, as a citation for institutional analysis, as a reference through the social discourse behind and through culture Four different ways of using local records after the normative reference, and trying to find out the possible relationship between the trend of academic trend and historical research in recent years, and the extent to which we can make use of the local history data. On this basis, the author thinks that chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chih chh