《文心雕龙》中《附会》篇旨 ,不应作为构思文章、谋篇布局的写作命题来理解。它实质上是作家在完成作品草创之后 ,重新审理文稿 ,而依照作文章法对文稿修改整理、加工完善的定稿活动内容 ,即现代意义上的修改再创造。只有作这样的理论认识 ,才能解释《附会》在全书篇次结构中的现存位置 ,得出《文心雕龙》的确体系完整、结构严密的评价。读解《附会》原文 ,也可以证明其实践针对性不在写作进行时态 ,而在成文之后的完善文辞的努力 ,其目的是“令章靡疚 ,亦善之亚”,义承《指瑕》篇结论 “Wen Xin Diao Long” in the “meeting” articles purpose, should not be as a concept article, seek layout of the writing proposition to understand. In essence, it is the writer who revises the manuscript after completing the drafting of the work, and in accordance with the composition of the essay, revises and modifies the manuscript and finalizes the contents of the finalized manuscript, that is, the modification and re-creation in the modern sense. Only by doing this kind of theoretical understanding can we explain the extant position of the annexation in the sub-structure of the whole book and conclude that the system of “Wen Xin Diao Long” is indeed a complete and well-structured evaluation. The purpose of reading the texts of “annexation” can also prove that its practical pertinence lies not in the writing tense, but its efforts in perfecting the diction after its formulation are aimed at "making the chapter a guilty conscience, Conclusion