论文部分内容阅读
目的 观察卡氏 16 PF中译本在当代不同专业大学生中的测试情况。方法 采用刘永和修订卡氏 16 PF中译本对 10 5 3名理科、文科、艺术系学生进行集体心理测验 ,并对其中的 5 2名学生进行了重复测试。对 32例符合 CCMD- - R的大学生神经症患者进行 16 PF测试。结果 当代不同专业大学生 16 PF人格因素具有显著性差异 ,在 2 4项人格因素和复合人格因素中 ,男性有 17项存在显著性差异 (P <0 .0 5 ,P <0 .0 1) ,女性有 2 2项存在显著性差异 (P <0 .0 5 ,P <0 .0 1)。卡氏 16 PF重测稳定性良好 ,(重测相关 r =0 .134～ 0 .838,P =0 .0 2～ 0 .0 0 0 1)。大学生神经症患者与医学生组进行的 t检验显示男性有9项人格因素和复合人格因素存在显著性差异 ,女性有 12项人格因素和复合人格因素存在显著性差异。结论 当代大学生人格变化的多元化趋势明显 ,建立专业常模是当务之急。 16 PF重测相关性良好 ,鉴别力高。神经症患者与医学生在多项人格因素上的显著性差异提示神经症患者存在人格缺陷。
Objective To observe the test results of the Chinese version of Karl’s 16 PF in contemporary college majors. Methods A total of 1055 undergraduates of science, liberal arts and arts were enrolled in a Chinese version of Liu’s 16th revised Cardinals. The 52 students were tested repeatedly. Sixteen PF tests were performed on 32 neurotic students with CCMD-R. Results There were significant differences in 16 PF among college students of different majors in the present age. Of the 24 personality factors and complex personality factors, 17 were significant differences (P <0.05, P <0.01) There are 22 women there is a significant difference (P <0.05, P <0.01). The Cardan 16 PF retest stability is good, (retest-related r = 0.134-0.838, P = 0.002-0.0001). Student’s neurosis and medical students’ t-test showed that there were 9 personality factors and complex personality factors in men. There were 12 personality factors and complex personality factors in women. Conclusion The trend of diversification of contemporary college students’ personality is obvious. Establishing professional norm is a top priority. 16 PF retest correlation is good, high discriminability. Neurotic patients and medical students in a number of personality factors significant differences suggest that there are personality disorders in patients with neurosis.