论文部分内容阅读
图书馆的社会职能,是从宏观上对图书馆各项具体业务活动的高度概括,并非仅仅对个体图书馆开展的具体工作而言。当然,从宏观上抽象概括出的职能,要以微观的具体工作为基础,并在图书馆各种微观具体的业务上表现出来。所以,考察图书馆的职能必须从微观和宏观两个方面着眼。吴志荣同志在《关于我国图书馆职能理论的新思考》(载《图书情报知识》1990年第1期,下称吴文)中,提出了“筛选职能”。我认为,这是值得商榷的。1、从微观上看,“筛选职能”的提出违背了概念逻辑。众所周知,文献整序(或整理)职能包括文献选择、文献加工、文献组织(含文献剔除)等内容。如果我们承认
The social function of a library is a macro-level overview of all the specific business activities of a library, not just the specific work carried out by individual libraries. Of course, the macroscopically abstracted functions should be based on microscopic concrete work and manifested in various microcosmic specific operations of the library. Therefore, the study of library functions must be microscopic and macroscopic two aspects. Comrade Wu Zhirong proposed a “screening function” in his “New Thoughts on the Theory of the Functions of Chinese Libraries” (contained in “Knowledge on Library and Information” No. 1, 1990, hereinafter referred to as Wu Wen). I think this is debatable. 1, From the microscopic point of view, the “screening function” is proposed contrary to the concept of logic. As we all know, the literature order (or finishing) functions include literature selection, literature processing, literature organization (including document excluded) and so on. If we admit it