论文部分内容阅读
“V+去”和“V+走”在动词的选择、可能式的构成和界性特征等方面都表现出明显的差异:“V+去”中表达自移事件和致移事件的动词在数量上相差不大,而“V+走”中则相差悬殊;“V+去”基本上不构成可能式,“V+走”基本上都有相应的可能式;“Vi+去”表现出无界谓词的特点,“Vi+走”则表现出有界谓词的特点;“Vt+去”和“Vt+走”的有界程度不同,前者的有界性偏低;“V+走”倾向于表达致移事件,而且倾向于选择“把/被”字句和受事主语句,而“V+去”表达致移事件时则有更多句式选择的可能。
“V + Go” and “V + Go” show obvious differences in terms of verb choice, possible composition and boundary features: V + go “is not the same in terms of quantity, but there is a big difference in” V + go “;” V + go “basically does not constitute a possible form, and” V + go “basically has the corresponding possible formula; ”Vi + Go“ shows the characteristics of unbounded predicate, ”Vi + Go“ shows the characteristics of the bound predicate; ”Bt + Go“ and ”Vt + Go“ have different degrees of boundedness, Sex is low; ”V + Go “ tends to express the event of shift, and tends to select ”put / get “ and statement of subject, while ”V + go Sentence selection possible.