论文部分内容阅读
目的探索新的晕机病易感性预测方法。方法采用诱发试验的方法对３１０名飞行学员进行了晕机病易感性的预测。刺激手段是阶梯式增加的Ｃｏｒｉｏｌｉｓ加速度刺激，并采用Ｇｒａｙｂｉｅｌ急性运动病症状分级标准作为反应高低的评定依据。预测结论共分Ａ、Ｂ、Ｃ、Ｄ、Ｅ和Ｆ六级。然后在检验飞行中对２３４人的实际晕机反应情况进行了观察。将此观察结果同预测检查的结论进行了对比分析。结果不同晕机病易感性预测等级的飞行学员其晕机反应程度存在显著性差异（Ｐ＜０．０１），其晕机病停飞率也不相同：晕机病易感性预测为Ａ、Ｂ两级的学员晕机病停飞率为零；Ｆ级的全部因晕机病而停飞；Ｃ、Ｄ、Ｅ级者的晕机病停飞率分别为５．３％、１５．２％和５１．６％（Ｐ＜０．０１）。结论本研究建立的飞行学员晕机病易感性预测方法及相应的评定标准，经过检验飞行验证具有很高的预测符合率
Objective To explore a new prediction method of airsickness susceptibility. Methods The sensitivities of 310 flight students to airsickness were predicted by the induction test. The stimulus was a step-up Coriolis acceleration stimulus, and the Graybiel acute motion sickness symptom grading criteria was used as the basis for the response. Prediction conclusion is divided into A, B, C, D, E and F six. Then the real airsickness reaction of 234 people in the test flight was observed. This observation is compared with the conclusion of the prediction test. Results There was a significant difference in airsickness between flight students with different degrees of susceptibility to ailments (P <0.01). The rates of airsickness and halt were also different: the predictors of airsickness were predicted as A and B students The airsickness and grounded flying rate was zero; all of F-class grounded due to motion sickness; C, D, E-class airsickness disease arrest rates were 5.3%, 15.2% and 51.6% (P <0.01). Conclusions The method of predicting the airsickness susceptibility of flight students established by this study and the corresponding assessment standards, the verified flight verification has a high predictive coincidence rate