论文部分内容阅读
目的研究甲状腺占位性病变诊断中应用常规超声联合超声弹性成像的价值。方法 150例甲状腺占位性病变患者作为本次研究对象,均给予常规超声诊断及常规超声联合超声弹性成像诊断,比较两种检查方式的准确率,观察病理诊断良恶性病变常规超声联合超声弹性成像技术评分情况。结果 150例甲状腺占位性病变患者,病理诊断恶性53例,良性97例;常规超声诊断恶性56例,良性95例;常规超声联合超声弹性成像诊断恶性52例,良性98例。常规超声诊断准确率为92.0%,常规超声联合超声弹性成像诊断准确率为98.0%,常规超声联合超声弹性成像诊断准确率高于常规超声诊断,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。常规超声联合超声弹性成像良性占位大多位于1~4分,恶性占位则大多位于4~7分。结论临床上利用常规超声联合超声弹性成像技术开展甲状腺占位性病变的诊断,有助于提升准确率,具有较高的运用价值,值得大力推广。
Objective To study the value of conventional ultrasound combined with elastography in the diagnosis of thyroid thyroid lesions. Methods 150 patients with thyroid space-occupying lesions as the object of this study were given conventional ultrasound diagnosis and conventional ultrasound combined with elastography to diagnose, compare the accuracy of the two test methods, the pathological diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions by conventional ultrasound combined with elastography Technical rating. Results 150 cases of thyroid space-occupying lesions, pathological diagnosis of malignant 53 cases, benign 97 cases; routine ultrasonic diagnosis of malignant 56 cases, benign 95 cases; conventional ultrasound combined with ultrasound elastography diagnosis of malignant 52 cases, benign 98 cases. The diagnostic accuracy of conventional ultrasound was 92.0%. The diagnostic accuracy of conventional ultrasound combined with elastography was 98.0%. The diagnostic accuracy of conventional ultrasound combined with elastography was higher than that of conventional ultrasound. The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conventional ultrasound combined with elastography benign masses are mostly located in 1 to 4 points, mostly in malignant placeholder 4 to 7 minutes. Conclusion The clinical diagnosis of thyroid gland lesions by conventional ultrasound combined with ultrasound elastography is helpful to improve the accuracy rate and has high value for use. It is worth to be popularized.