论文部分内容阅读
新古典经济学中的外生和内生增长理论忽视了技术开发的资源限制与波状模式。种群动力学中的逻辑斯蒂增长和物种竞争模型提供了一种市场份额竞争中由技术小波驱动经济增长的演化框架。在实践中,干中学与知识积累忽略了技术进步的中断性质。创造性毁灭可以通过知识代谢来理解。政策和制度在技术周期的不同阶段共同演化。劳动分工受到市场规模、资源种类和环境波动的限制。在一个产业生态系统的稳定性和复杂性之间存在一个得失消长的关系。多元化发展战略模式是在面临学习的不确定性时由文化和环境共同塑造形成的。西方劳动分工模式的特点是节省劳动力和采用资源密集型技术,而与此同时,亚洲和中国的分工模式为资源节约型和劳动密集型。非线性种群动力学提供了自亚当·斯密(Adam Smith)、马尔萨斯(Malthus)以来到熊彼特(Schumpeter)为止的一个统一的经济增长和技术发展的演化理论。
The theory of exogenous and endogenous growth in neoclassical economics ignores the resource constraints and wavy patterns of technology development. Logistic growth and species competition models in population dynamics provide an evolutionary framework driven by technological wavelets for economic growth in market share competition. In practice, learning by doing and accumulation of knowledge ignore the disruptive nature of technological progress. Creative destruction can be understood through knowledge metabolism. Policies and institutions are evolving together at different stages of the technology cycle. The division of labor is subject to market size, resource types and environmental fluctuations. There is a gain and loss relationship between the stability and complexity of an industrial ecosystem. The diversified development strategy model is shaped by culture and environment in the face of the uncertainty of learning. The Western model of labor division is characterized by labor-saving and resource-intensive technologies while at the same time the mode of labor division in Asia and China is resource-saving and labor-intensive. Nonlinear population dynamics provide a unified theory of evolution of economic growth and technological development since Adam Smith and Malthus to Schumpeter.