目的:研究“压、端、牵”手法的要领;旋后背伸位与旋前掌屈位固定疗效比较。方法:选择观察组48例、对照组46例,加以比较。结果:94例疗效均获优。结论:“压、端、牵”手法操作简便,损伤小,其要领是术者必须定位准,并与助手相互协调;旋后背伸位与旋前掌屈位固定最后疗效无明显差别,但前者较后者消肿时间短,背伸、旋后功能恢复快。 Objective: To study the essentials of “pressure, end, pull” technique; Methods: 48 cases in observation group and 46 cases in control group were selected for comparison. Results: 94 cases were excellent results. Conclusion: “pressure, the end, pull ” approach is simple, less damage, the essentials is that the surgeon must be accurate, and with the assistant coordination; supination dorsal extension and pre-rotation palmar flexion final effect no significant difference , But the former than the latter swelling time is short, dorsal extension, spin faster recovery.