论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨湿润烧伤膏治疗烧烫伤的临床效果。方法选择2012年1月~2014年1月收治的烧烫伤患者60例为研究对象,应用随机数字表将60例患者分为观察组和对照组各30例,在予以对症治疗及清创处理后,观察组予湿润烧伤膏外敷,对照组予磺胺嘧啶银悬浊液外涂,比较两组的止痛效果、患者治疗期间的痛苦情况及创面愈合时间情况。结果观察组患者的止痛总有效率达90.0%,其止痛效果明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(90.0%vs 60.0%,P<0.05)。观察组患者治疗期间痛苦程度明显轻于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者的浅Ⅱ度、深Ⅱ度、Ⅲ度创面愈合时间明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论湿润烧伤膏治疗烧烫伤,能止痛,减轻患者疼痛,缩短创面愈合时间,值得推广和应用。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of MEBO in treating burn and scald. Methods Sixty burn and scald patients admitted from January 2012 to January 2014 were selected as the research object. Sixty patients were divided into observation group and control group with 30 cases in random number table. After symptomatic treatment and debridement . The observation group was given external application of MEBO. The control group was coated with silver sulfadiazine suspension. The analgesic effect, the pain situation during the treatment and wound healing time were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of analgesic in the observation group was 90.0%. The analgesic effect was significantly better than that of the control group (90.0% vs 60.0%, P <0.05). The degree of pain in the observation group was significantly lighter than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The healing time of superficial Ⅱ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ degrees in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion MEBO can cure burn and burn, relieve pain, relieve pain and shorten wound healing time. It is worth promoting and applying.