对于休谟的知识论,存在着两种不同的解释,一种是以托马斯·里德为代表的怀疑论解释,另一种是以康普·斯密为代表的自然主义解释,然而,两种解释传统都掩盖了休谟对认知规范性的论述。事实上,休谟的认知规范性理论在休谟的知识论中占据重要地位。超越于激进的怀疑论和盲目的自然主义立场,休谟的温和怀疑论是一种认知规范性理论,规定我们应该如何形成信念。 There are two different interpretations of Hume’s epistemology, one is skepticism represented by Thomas Reid and the other is naturalistic explanation represented by CommScope. However, two kinds Hume’s disregard of Hume’s discourse on normative norms is explained by tradition. In fact, Hume’s cognitive normative theory occupies an important position in Hume’s epistemology. Beyond the radical skepticism and the blind naturalistic standpoint, Hume’s moderate skepticism is a cognitive normative theory that defines how we should form beliefs.