论文部分内容阅读
傳記是最能體現《明儒學案》史學價值的部份。然在鮮明王學立場的前提下,黄宗羲是否還能真正秉持相容而不偏頗的學術態度去書寫被收録的學者之傳記,遂成爲一項值得深入探究的議題。本文以過往研究較爲忽略的江右代表人物聶豹在《學案》裏的傳記爲中心,嘗試厘析這位在正史上的實際評價並不高的陽明後學在黄宗羲筆下的政治形象及其何以被構建出來的原委。研究從《聶豹傳》文本入手,參照與黄氏所可能接觸過的史源,遞進式地向我們展示作者如何通過篩選、删薙,甚至於改動史料來“確保”傳主的正面形象。黄宗羲對聶豹“精明强幹”政治形象的最終塑造,其更大的意義或許在於爲我們提供了一個重新反思《明儒學案》傳記在今後史學研究中的價值與利用問題的具體事例。
Biography is the best embodiment of “Ming Confucian Case” part of the historical value. However, under the precondition of being a clear-cut Wangxue, whether Huang Zongxi can still truly compose a biographical biography without misleading academic attitude has become a topic that deserves further exploration. This article attempts to analyze the political image of Yang Zong-fu’s later school under Huang Zong-xi’s criticism which is not highly evaluated in the history of China. Why is it built out? The research begins with the text “Nipao Biography” and refers to the historical sources that Huang may have contact with, and shows us how the author can “ensure ” the master by screening, deleting and even changing the historical materials positive image. Huang Zongxi’s ultimate shaping of the political image of Nie Bao may be that it provides us with a concrete example of rethinking the value and utilization of the biography of Ming Confucianism in future historical studies .