论文部分内容阅读
张舜徽教授主编的《中国史学家传》的出版,在普及历史知识的通俗读物领域里填补了一项空白,这是叫人十分高兴的事。通读全书,我一方面为每位执笔者的深入浅出的绍介赞赏不止,另一方面也为个别传文的失实之处摇头惋惜。为了防止以讹传讹,为了探讨撰写通俗读物的经验,因冒昧草为此文,以就正于广大读者。《钱大昕传》的开头说: “乾隆十六年(公元一七五一年),侍御史兼任紫阳书院院长的王峻,为朝廷寻觅人才,路经嘉定。地方官王鸣盛把钱大昕推荐给王峻。”按这段文字有几处不符合实际。首先,时间不对。这件事发生在乾隆十四年,并非乾隆十六年。这一点,钱大昕的自编《年谱》说得很清楚。另外,据《年谱》及《潜研堂文集》
The publication of the “Biography of Chinese Historians” edited by Professor Zhang Shunhui filled a gap in the field of popular books that popularized historical knowledge. This is a very gratifying thing. Throughout the book, on the one hand, each author appreciates more than simple explanations for each author, and on the other hand, I am sorry for the misrepresentations of individual essays. In order to prevent the erroneous assertion, in order to explore the experience of writing popular books, due to presumptuous grass for this article, just as the majority of readers. At the beginning of Qian Daxin, Qian said: “In the 16th year of Emperor Qianlong (1751), Wang Jun, who served as president of Ziyang College of Shi Huang Shi, sought talents for the court and traveled through Jiading. Daxin recommended to Wang Jun. ”According to this text there are several inconsistent with the actual. First of all, time is wrong. This happened in Qianlong fourteen years, not sixteen years of Qianlong. This point, Qian Daxin’s own “Chronicle” made it very clear. In addition, according to “Chronicle” and “latent research hall corpus”