本文作者阿贝尔·雷慕沙(Abel-Remusat,1788—1832),法国著名汉学家。1815年,年仅27岁的雷慕沙担任了法兰西学院“汉文与鞑靼文、满文语言文学讲座”第一任教授,也正是这一讲座的设立,标志着专业汉学在法国的建立。雷慕沙一生著作颇丰,其有关中国经典的研究与译文评述被收录到他的论文集《亚洲杂纂》(Melanges.Asiatiques)中,于1825年在法国巴黎出版。本文译自他的两篇评述文章,分别是对英国汉学家马士曼(Joshua Marshman)英译《论语》和法国汉学家儒莲(Stanislas Julien)所译《孟子》两部译著的评介。对于两位汉学家的译著,雷慕沙有褒扬,亦有批判。对于马士曼所译《论语》,雷慕沙采取一种批判的角度进行评介。当然,雷慕沙也肯定了马士曼译本的优点以及译者为此付出的诸多努力。而对于儒莲所译《孟子》,雷慕沙将之与卫方济(Francois No(e|¨)l)译本进行比较,更多的是对儒莲译本的褒奖。整体来看,雷慕沙的评述客观而中肯。 The author of this paper Abel-Remusat (1788-1832), a famous French sinologist. In 1815, only 27-year-old Remus served as the French Academy “Chinese and Tatar, Manchu language literature lectures, ” the first professor, it is also the establishment of this lecture, marking the professional Sinology in France The establishment of. His life writings quite abundant, his research on the Chinese classics and translation commentary was included in his essay collection “Asian Compilation” (Melanges.Asiatiques), published in 1825 in Paris, France. This article is translated from two of his review articles, which are respectively the translations of the English translation of the Analects of Confucius by the British sinologist Joshua Marshman and the translation of Mencius by French scholar Stanislas Julien. For the translation of two sinologists, there is commendation and criticism. As for the Analects of Confucius translated by Masman, Ramosha takes a critical angle to make a comment. Of course, Remusha also affirmed the merits of the Maasman translations and the translators’ efforts to that end. As for the “Mencius” translated by Confucianism, Lemusha compares it with the translated version of Francois No (e | ¨) l) and more of the praise for the translation of Confucianism and Confucianism. On the whole, Ray Musha’s comments are objective and pertinent.