论文部分内容阅读
目的 :分析无痛人工流产与传统手术流产的治疗效果。方法 :本次研究中选择2016年11月—2017年4月我院接受的120例接受流产的患者作为研究对象,随机分为甲组和乙组,分别给予传统手术流产和无痛人流流产,对效果进行分析。结果 :对甲组和乙组的手术时间、月经恢复时间和出血量对比,实践证明,乙组的各项系数少于甲组。甲组和乙组的疼痛现象分析,甲组的无痛率66.7%,乙组的无痛率86.7%,乙组的效果更为明显。结论:无痛人工流产方式的优越性比较明显,整体优势突出,出血量少,手术时间短,值得推广和应用。
Objective: To analyze the therapeutic effect of painless induced abortion and traditional surgical abortion. Methods: In this study, 120 patients admitted to abortion in our hospital from November 2016 to April 2017 were selected as study subjects and were randomly divided into Group A and Group B, which were given conventional surgical abortion and painless abortion respectively. Analysis of the effect. Results: Comparison of operation time, menstruation recovery time and bleeding volume in Group A and Group B proved that the coefficients of Group B were less than those of Group A. Group A and Group B pain phenomenon analysis, Group A no pain rate 66.7%, Group B painless rate 86.7%, Group B effect is more obvious. Conclusion: The superiority of painless abortion method is obvious, the overall advantages are prominent, the amount of bleeding is less, the operation time is short, which is worth popularizing and applying.