论文部分内容阅读
在历史研究中我们是不能否认比较法的价值的。比较法有助于人们发现问题 ,澄清历史事件的多个侧面。在对事件发生原因进行解释或对所做解释进行批判时 ,比较法是不可或缺的。在历史研究中进行比较有助于避免出现偏狭的“氛围”。但比较历史学家仍然并不多见。历史研究中许多倍受珍视的原则———参考原始资料 ,考虑事件发生背景 ,以及事件发展全过程 ,有时都和比较法发生冲突。最近一种新的跨国研究的方法———纠葛历史研究法(histoirecrois啨ｅ)———以一种崭新而有趣的方式来挑战比较历史研究学者。但比较历史研究(histoirecompar啨ｅ)和纠葛历史研究是彼此需要且能够和平共处的。
We can not deny the value of comparative law in historical research. Comparative law can help people find problems and clarify aspects of historical events. Comparative law is indispensable in explaining the causes of the incident or in critique the explanation. A comparison in historical studies helps to avoid a narrow “atmosphere.” But comparative historians are still rare. Many of the most cherished principles of historical research - sometimes conflicting with comparative law - refer to the source material, consider the context of the incident, and the entire course of events. A recent new method of transnational research, histoirecrois --- e, challenges comparative historians in a new and interesting way. However, comparative history studies (histoire compar) e) and entanglement history studies are both needed and peaceful coexistence.