论文部分内容阅读
1996年9月,济南市政府决定为市区高架路建设征收道路建设费。规定机关、事业单位车辆免收,出租车每辆每年收2000元,连收3年。出租车司机认为自身难以承受,以停运为手段,要求市政府收回决定。结果是市政府答应核查出租车的负担,取消其中不合理的收费,但城市道路建设费不能减。出租车司机的要求为何没有得到满足,市政府又为何做出让步,市民对此事件的反应又如何呢?本文将从经济
In September 1996, the Jinan Municipal Government decided to impose road construction fees for the construction of urban viaducts. Provisions of institutions, institutions exempt vehicles, taxis each received 2,000 yuan per year, even for 3 years. Taxi drivers consider themselves unbearable to stop shipping as a means to require the municipal government to withdraw the decision. As a result, the municipal government promised to check the tax burden of taxis and abolished the unreasonable charges, but the urban road construction fee could not be reduced. Why the taxi driver's requirements have not been met, why did the city government make any concession and how did the citizens react to this incident?