论文部分内容阅读
不久前,北航幼儿因会计周某因侵吞单位公款12万余元,构成贪污罪,被海淀法院一审判处有期徒刑10年6个月。就此,“中国会计视野网站”进行了一项小调查,该调查的阶段性结果是.认为法院的量刑“重”的占76%;认为“制度不完善有错,量刑应考虑予以减轻”的占33%;认为应该追究单位的制度漏洞之错的占73%。看来,相当数量的人们认为法院时本案的量刑有些重,同时,单位制度不完善问题开始进入人们的思考范围。单位制度问题属会计职业犯罪的外因,这里暂且不谈。那么,本案的量刑真是重吗?看过类似的会计犯罪案例,我们的心又该如何摆放?
Not long ago, due to the accounting Zhou account for the accident due to embezzlement units more than 120,000 yuan, Beihang children constituted a crime of corruption and was sentenced to 10 years and 6 months in first instance by Haidian Court. In this connection, a small survey was conducted on the “China Accounting Perspectives Website”, and the staged result of the survey was that 76% of the court’s sentencing amounts to “heavy”; that “the system is not perfect and that the sentencing should be Consider to be reduced ”accounted for 33%; think it should be investigated for flaws in the system of institutional errors accounted for 73%. It seems that a considerable number of people think that the court sentencing the case a little heavier at the same time, the imperfect system of units began to enter people’s thinking. The problem of the unit system is the external cause of accounting crime, let’s not talk about it here. So, the case of sentencing really heavy? Read a similar case of accounting crime, how should our heart placed?