泰戈尔说:“静止便是死亡,只有运动才能敲开永生的大门”。马克思主义基本原理早就告诉我们,人类和社会是运动变化发展的,运动是绝对的,静止是相对的,运动是永恒的,客观的,没有起点和终点,运动无时无刻不存在于我们的生活之中。而杜林先生在其撰写的《哲学教程》中胡说物质和运动是可以分离的。他的形而上学思维方式使他在一系列问题上陷入了唯心主义先验论。这就意味着我们拜读恩格斯先生的《反杜林论》哲学编能更多的了解杜林先生的折中主义的哲学以及恩格斯对杜林观点的反驳和批判,他在《反杜林论》中的驳论、悖论和立论能对我们系统了解和钻研科学技术哲学有极大的现实意义。为此,本文首先简单介绍了杜林和恩格斯观点的不同;接着从恩格斯对杜林的驳论来建立自己的悖论和立论方面加以诠释;最后简单叙述了恩格斯的方法论;以便今后能更好的指导我的学习和工作。 Tagore said: “Still is death, only the movement can knock on the door of eternal life ”. The fundamentals of Marxism have long told us that human beings and society are subject to changes in their movements, that the movement is absolute, that the movement is absolute, that the movement is eternal, objective, that there is no beginning and end, and that the movement does not exist in our lives all the time in. Herr Duhring, in her Philosophical Tutorial, can say that matter and movement are separable. His metaphysical way of thinking led him to fall into an idealist a priori on a series of issues. This means that we should read more about Mr. Turin’s eclectic philosophy and read Engels’s refutation and criticism of Herr Duhring’s views when we read Mr. Engels’s philosophy of “Anti-Duhring” The refutations, paradoxes and arguments in this book are of great practical significance for our systematic understanding and study of philosophy of science and technology. To this end, this article first briefly introduces the differences between the views of Turin and Engels; then explains Engels from the perspective of Herr Duhring to establish his own paradox and argument; finally, Engels’s methodology is briefly described so as to be better in the future Guide my study and work.