论文部分内容阅读
变格前后作文题中都有“说开去”——这是作文的“雷区”。但是,作者规避了“散乱”的风险,各自都有明确的中心。作者处理“说开去”的成功做法是:所议,先聚合;所据,才发散。两文都请“诸葛亮”引出不同话题,其变格的做法是:从“诸葛亮出山”一事的众多属性中选择同话题相符的属性,再联想到同“此属性”类似的事例。如果将变格前后的作文,作为2006年高考湖北卷的应考作文,它们能深刻地把握作文题的命意。
Before and after transposition, there are “say open” in the essay questions—this is the “minefield” of the composition. However, the authors avoided the risk of “scattered” and each had a clear center. The author’s successful approach to “say it out” is: the discussion is the first to converge; the evidence is divergent. Both articles asked Zhuge Liang to elicit different topics. The disqualification approach was to choose the attribute that matches the topic from among the many attributes of “Zhuge Liang’s coming out of the mountain”, and then associate it with an example similar to “this attribute”. If the arranging composition before and after the transition is used as the composition of the exam for Hubei in the 2006 college entrance examination, they can profoundly grasp the intention of the composition.