西方海洋科学家与美拉尼西亚沿海渔民由于世界观上的根本差异,会从同样的观察得出不同的结论。根据同样的归纳性逻辑,科学家与当地渔民都发现方尾鳟鱼在每月某时聚集在珊瑚礁某一通道。但源自不同世界观的不同前提,却让他们对鱼群何以如此得出完全不同的结论。这些不同,对海洋资源的开发(或不开发)和管理很有意义。我在本文中分析了科学知识与原住知识中都存在的、我所谓的经验缺陷。这缺陷涉及鱼类的生物学与生态学,有时会造成鱼类资源管理的不当。我主张以科学教育来补充原住知识体系,尽管有人认为二者风马牛走不到一起。 Western marine scientists and Melanesian fishermen from the sea due to the fundamental differences in the world view, will come to the same conclusion from different conclusions. According to the same inductive logic, scientists and local fishermen both found that tail trout gathered on a coral reef at a time of the month. However, the different premises derived from different worldviews lead them to come to completely different conclusions about why fish are so derived. These differences make sense for the development (or lack of development) and management of marine resources. In this paper, I analyze the so-called empirical shortcomings that exist in both scientific knowledge and aboriginal knowledge. This flaw relates to the biology and ecology of fish and sometimes leads to the mismanagement of fish stocks. I advocate the science education to supplement the system of aboriginal knowledge, although some people think they are not together.